Although Exchange Server 2013 support 16 TB of database size but still we insisit to go for 2 TB as recommendation. Is there any reason for it ?…Yes as follow
1. Larger volumes takes longer time to backup and restore
2. It takes huge amount of time for replicating larger volume to the passive copy database in case of disaster
3. Background maintenance that is performed by the managed folder assistant will utilize more time
4. The risk profile of losing a large volume or device is significantly higher than losing a smaller device or volume.
5. It utilize significantly longer to check disk for integrity if there is any type of corruption
© 版权信息：
作者：PANGSHARE
发布平台：PANGSHARE | 文章链接：https://www.pangshare.com/exchange-2013-maximum-database-size/
本文内容仅限非商业性使用，如需商用（包括但不限于广告投放、付费专栏、企业宣传等），请邮件联系原作者获得独家授权，违者将依法追究法律责任。
微信扫一扫 
